Archive for December, 2008

Als Blog Pastor Al | 30 Dec 2008

Two Churches in one Sunday

I visited two churches this past Sunday.  I attended the 8:30 service at Parkside Church in Cleveland where one of my heroes Dr. Alistair Begg is the preacher and then went at 10:00 to the cafe contemporary service at Hudson Community chapel where my son-in-law and daughter attend.  The two services were very different to say the lease and both, as do all services of worship, had things commendable and things that caused concern.  Let me begin with the positives at both the services and then turn to what I saw as points of concern.

First you need to know that is was cold in Cleveland on Sunday morning.  Winds were blowing from 35 to 50 mph.  Our trailblazer was blown about in the early morning as I made my way from Haley’s house to Parkside.  I arrived at 8:10 and walked into an almost empty huge sanctuary.  All of that changed by 8:20 when almost empty became almost full, at least 800 people present for the first of three services that Sunday.  The service began with a Scripture reading from John 1 [+/-] and then a praise segment let by a praise team and praise band.  Three songs gave way to a brief welcome and a very well delivered pastoral prayer.  The pastoral prayer included specific mention of various concerns in the congregation.  More music followed and then the receipt of the offering prior to which guests were asked not to give.  I had for me  ”God Moment” as I sat there and heard, “if you are guest today, just sit back and relax; we do not want you to give.” I was mildly offended:  how can one worship God and not give!  Giving is at the heart of the worship of God and in the early church was always done at the end of worship as the most clear communication of commitment.  That has not changed.  It still is that.  Our giving shows our love for Jesus, really.  Oh, I had a thought as I looked around at the beauty of the place that this church did not need my gifts, but that passed; because my gifts are given to the glory of God for the work of the Gospel through that church.  So I gave with a joyfully obedient heart.  Then came the sermon that was well done.  The text was 2 Peter and the theme was the need to know the Word of God by reading and studying the Word of God.  There was no invitation but there were “read the Bible” New Testaments given to everyone as we departed worship. It was a very good experience. 

But there were concerns that I carried away.  First, nobody ever spoke to me until we had that “greet your neighbor” time.  Now, you have to know that I despise those times because they are are so structured to have no substance.  This one didn’t.  None do.  A “greeter” passed by me four times and never spoke.  The service, further, was very structured.  I knew from the first downbeat what the theme of the worship was which is good but it was so carefully ordered and organized that there was no room for spontaneity.  The sermon though well done was thoroughly rehearsed to fit within a carefully coordinated time sequence.  And everything was set up to move toward that moment when the people leaving were to accept the gifts of the New Testament.  I stood in the foyer for a few minutes and watched.  Most didn’t.  It lasted for one hour because the next group of congregants had to come in.  I did not leave feeling that I had enjoyed an intimate encounter with the living God.  Now those of you who know me well will find this strange.  This church is fully reformed in her theology so her doctrine is orthodox.  But it showed me yet again the serious shortcomings of multiple services in mega churches.  It is more like a cattle drive than a communion of the saints.

I then made the twenty minute drive down interstate 271 off Ohio 8 to the Hudson Community Chapel to enjoy the cafe service where the place was packed with hundreds, and more than one hundred standing in the back of the room without seats.  We observed communion and baptism.  The music was contemporary and the lyrics glorified God.  It was loud with all the instruments.  But it was passionate.  One of the pastors gave a brief presentation on the meaning of the supper and it was brilliant.  He then “fenced the table.”  He made it clear that the Supper was for believers only even saying that what he was doing was a help to unbelievers to keep them from coming under the further judgment of God by partaking of the elements in a way that dishonored God.  Communion was a reverently holy celebration followed by baptism in which all kinds of candidates first gave testimonies before being baptized.  Now my struggle with this service was first the carefully timed structure so that the leaders could again get us in and out in one hour.  My larger issue, however, was participating in singing about the great holiness of God while watching people around me sipping coffee and sharing a pastry.  Those two are irreconcilable to me.  I know, I am fifty-six; but I think there is more here than my age.  I would not walk into the presence of Bush or Obama with  a cup of coffee and cheese danish in my hand; and worship is about entering into the presence of the King of Kings.  We sang one song that had these lines juxtaposed, “brilliant creator and beautiful friend.”  He is both but I wonder if in singing these lines so closely together if we don’t lose the luster of His brilliance in the light of the love of His friendship.

Anyway, it was a good experience for me.  I learned a lot at both places.  I learned yet again that there really are all kinds of ways to worship our great God and the most to be pitied among us are those who have reduced the focus of worship to the forms of worship.  Can I be so bold to suggest that only the religious would do that; the righteous know that our God is so great that we cannot and will not reduce the worship of His Name to any set forms.

Advent &Sermons David | 28 Dec 2008

Simeon: He was Ready

 

Luke 2 [+/-]: 21-36

Don concludes the advent series as he looks at Simeon and Anna, 2 older people who awaited the coming of Christ. This was really a great message, and wonderful conclusion to the question “What happened as people encountered Jesus”

Als Blog Pastor Al | 24 Dec 2008

Christmas Eve

It is the eve of Christmas.  It is late afternoon and I am excitedly awaiting the Christmas Eve Candlelight Communion Service.  I love this service as much as I love anything that happens here during the year.  I look forward to it every year and the closer it comes, the more excited I get.  I have not always loved this service because I have not always been a believer, but I have always loved the eve of Christmas.

As a child it was all about Santa Claus.  As morning passed into afternoon and afternoon into evening, the exitement would build.  The family would begin to gather.  My grandfather, “Papa;” would begin to watch the sky.  I would join him.  The local TV station, we could get only two; would track Santa in the night sky.  But we had our own way of  looking toward the sky.  Somehow the stars were brighter and moon more full on the eve of Christmas.  The sky excited the imagination of this young boy as I used to behold the majesty above me.  I still examine the night sky on the eve of Christmas more than any other night.  It is for me at least a night unlike any other.  It will be tonight.  After the service, I will stroll silently through our church giving praise to God that He has given me the incredible privilege of serving among such wonderful people.  It is a gift far beyond my deserving and a trust that I treasure.  This annual silent stroll will be filled with the tears of great gratitude for the profound privilege of being the pastor at FBC Waynesboro.  Then it is off to the house where this year for the first time we will break a tradition of having people over and grilling steaks  with all the trimmings.  We leave early Christmas Day for a brief visit with Anne’s family and then on to Ohio.  So, it is early to bed this eve of Christmas.  But like most, I won’t sleep much not because of Santa; but because of the joy that will well up within me as I lie in bed and reflect on what a blessed man I am.  I hope you know His blessing in your life on this eve of Christmas, and I pray that your Christmas will be a “mass” of Christ.  Merry Christmas everybody.

Als Blog Pastor Al | 23 Dec 2008

The Shack

Well, I read it.  After getting the right book at last, I have read it.  I discovered that there was more than one book with the title, “The Shack.”  I now own two books with that title by two different authors.  But I finally got the “right” one and read it.  All I have time to do for now is simply to give my first but very deep impressions of this book.  I will return to it later and give further and  hopefully more clear and concrete reflections.  I want to reduce my initial response to this book to three.

First, it is a rather quick read.  I could have read the book in just a couple of hours but given its popularity; Iwanted to spend more time here.  Page after page left me asking the same question, “where is the beef?  What is the real substance and sustenance of this book?”  It was a page-turner alright and a tear-jerker but when I had finished I wished that I had turned the pages faster and not invested so much emotion.  The very fact that I did invest emotion in the book and stay with it is a testimony to the tenacity of the story line.  It grabs and holds.  Second, beyond the basic story line of the book that would grab  any parent with children, the book is basically shallow and superficial.  I commented along the way to a good friend that the reading public in America is in serious troulbe if this book represents what attracts and keeps us.  I love Koontz and Patterson novels, but reading them can be done a book a day; I do not consider either of the above named authors as culture shapers, but some seem to think this book by Young has that kind of impact.  To compare this book to Pilgrim’s Progress is like comparing the fourth grade Recreation League football team to Lombardi’s Packers or Chuck Noll’s Steelers.  Only those who do not know the genre would make such a silly if not sacrireligious comparison.  Third, this book makes mincemeat of the precious doctrine of the Trinity.

In an attempt to be clear, this book makes a mess of the most meaningful of Christian doctrines.  We may not get the doctrine of the Trinity exactly right since what we know of it is limited to what is clearly revealed in Scripture, and even there; there is mystery.  No human analogies ultimately really work in explicating this doctrine.  All human analogies of flawed.  We may not get it exactly right, but we had better at least be in line with what Scripture says and not setting forth that which contrary to Scripture.  The Bible makes clear that the essence of the Trinity is that God is one God manifest in three Persons with the Persons equal in identity but differing in activity which requires of necessity a hierarchical order of submission.  The Father is the Sovereign over all who manifests Himself in the Son who submits to the Father but not vice-versa as this book suggests, and the Spirit emerges from the Son and the Father submitting to both in conducting the will and work of both.  The Shack makes the Trinity “The Big Three” who are equal in relationship and in responsibility because in the view of this book:  responsibility is relationship.  Now wouldn’t that be just peachy if all that life in relationship to God was about was just the relationship?  What if it were true that there are no responsibilities that emerge out of the relationship and what is wanted from God along with the other two is just the enjoyment of the relationship?  Oh, don’t diminish the desire of God for a relationship with His own but don’t deny that that relationship always is fleshed out in the form of expressed and embodied responsibility.  Anything short of it is heresy.

This book is scary to me.  It will seduce many who mean well in making much of this book.  It says so much that is right that it is very hard to see and to say what is wrong.  But there is so much in the book that is wrong particulary if Scripture is right.

Advent &Sermons David | 21 Dec 2008

Real Grace

 

Matthew 1:18‐25

What is the primary and priority strategy of Satan in our society? Remembering that his aim is to appear as an angel of light which simply means that he is not after our disowning God but simply declaring God to be someone and something other than He is, I would contend that the primary and priority strategy of Satan in our society is the continual communication of cheap grace. We owe this phrase “cheap grace” to one of the great martyrs of the twentieth century, Dietrich Bonhoeffer.  The wonderful man of God stood tall and strong against the Nazi regime in Hitler’s Germany when so many in the church were either aligning with Hitler or at least choosing not to stand against him.  And it was these latter that bothered Bonhoeffer the most.  They contended that their relationship with God was a private affair of the heart and that being a Christian was about enjoying the blessings and benefits of God in this life and the comfort He brings us in the midst of conflict.  They believed in what Bonhoeffer called correctly cheap grace.  Let me let him define it for us:  “cheap grace is the preaching of forgiveness without requiring repentance, baptism without church discipline, communion without confession and absolution without personal confession.  Cheap grace is grace without discipleship, grace without the cross, grace without Jesus Christ, living and incarnate.  Costly grace is the treasure hidden in the field; for the sake of it man will go and gladly sell all that he has.  It is the pearl of great price that the merchant will sell all that he has to get.  It is the kingly rule of Christ for whose sake a man will pluck out the eye which causes him to stumble, it is the call of Jesus Christ at which the disciple leaves everything to follow him.  Costly grace is the gospel which must be sought again and again, the gift which must be asked for, the door at which a man must knock.  It is costly because it calls us to follow and it is grace because it calls us to follow Jesus Christ.”  Put simply, real grace is costly grace.  It is the work of God in us to change us from an orientation to ourselves to an orientation to God of which there is vital, visible, and victorious evidence.  We see real grace at work in the life of Joseph.  He experienced grace and evidences of grace are very present in his life. Let’s take a close look at this man this morning.

Learn more about this message by downloading the sermon notes here!

Als Blog Pastor Al | 14 Dec 2008

Musings on Santa Claus

I wrote on this slippery subject last year about this time.  But I have been moved to return again to the whole bruhaha about Santa and Christmas.  What has moved me this time is my experience last week with our Senior Adults at The Cove in Asheville.  We sat one day in one of our sessions singing Christmas music. Yes, we sang lots and lots of carols; but this time we were singing songs like “Winter Wonderland,” “White Christmas,” and “Rudolph.”  Some sat in the room with Christmas hats on top of their heads and jingle bells on various places on their clothes.  And I began to wonder why in the midst of some who seem to have so much trouble with Santa,  that these “old folks” were just having a joly good time.  They were singing as if they believed in him or at least as if they were just having fun during this most wonderful time of the year.

I understand, I better understand; the impetus to make sure that we do not miss the meaing of Christmas.  What I do not understand is “throwing out the baby with the bathwater.”  I believe that there are three basic approaches that believers can take to Christmas with only one of them being appropriate in temrs of being true to who we are while bearing witness to those in the world in which we live.  The first approach is to refuse to participate in anything Santa.  No trees.  No stockings.  No ornaments.  No holly and Ivy.  No Mistletoe.  I love the Mistletoe.  This is the “Saint Scrooge” apporach.  I do not believe that those who adopt this approach intend to be superior Christians, but it comes across that way.  The second approach is simply to be sucked into the whole atmosphere of the season.  Spend your money on stuff.  Talk to your children about Santa as if he really is real and make Jesus just an appendage to the season.  This approach will win you many friends but will produce no real influence on the culture.  If we are just like the pagan culture during this particular time of the year, then it is most likely true that we are like them the rest of the year too.  That is why over the years and even now, I have adopted a third approach.

It is to celebrate some of the traditions of this season that are secular, but to celebrate them as they are for what they are.  For example, I can talk about Santa Claus and the story of this man in red.  I can speak even to my children when they were younger about the stories and lores of legend that have accrued to the Clause.  I can talk about Rudolph and all the rest but never in terms of history or factuality, always in the languge of story.  Now let me be clear:  there is a danger here and I know it.  Because if we speak of Santa in the language of story and then read to our children “Bible Stories,” what are we saying to them?  A story is a story.  That is why it is so important that when you read the Bible to your family, you make sure that you make sure they know that what you are reading is the absolute truth of God.  This is no fiction.  This is foundational truth that is given to us by God from His Holy Hand.

This last approach is the one I have taken all of my adult life.  I do not think that it has wounded our children.  I do not think that they have warped psyches because their dear ole Dad talked with them about the this man of fable that comes round once a year.  But in the midst of this approach it has been my practice to make sure that our house through the celebration of Advent that we have made the main thing, the main thing.  At the end of the day, that is what is really important.

Sermons David | 11 Dec 2008

Worshiping Jesus

Matthew 2:1‐12

The Gospel of Matthew is thoroughly Jewish.  The Holy Spirit designed intent for this book is to show that Jesus is the Son of Abraham as the fullness of the fulfillment to the Father of the Faithful, and the Son of David as the one who rules the world as the Messiah King.  The Book opens with a genealogy that all of us who went to the Celebrators’ Conference at The Cove know better now than we have ever known before.  The genealogy has a very clear purpose:  it moves from Abraham to David and from David to the exile and from the exile to Jesus in three distinct movements, each movement equivalent to a Hebrew character. The first movement equivalent to what we would call a “D” and the second to what we would call a “V” and the third to what we would call a “D,” spelling out the name of David.  The account of the birth of Jesus begins right after the genealogy and is moved along by five verses from the Old Testament that find fulfillment in the coming of Jesus.  The Jews could not hear the number five and not think of the first five books of the Bible written by their first prophet Moses and thus would read these accounts and see them as the fulfillment of the promises of God to Moses and through David found in the birth of Jesus.  And I could go throughout the book and show you on page after page how prominently Jewish is this proclamation from Matthew.

Learn more about this message by downloading the sermon notes here

Als Blog Pastor Al | 09 Dec 2008

The Cove

I am sitting looking at the rain fall outside my window here at “The Cove” in Asheville, North Carolina.  The building in which I am sitting is right next door to the Billy Graham Training Center where the group from our church eats meals and attends meetings.  Both have been wonderful.  The basement of the Billy Graham Training Center houses the museum and the bookstore and just across the mountain is the majestic chapel.  It is a quite a sight to see even in the rain.  Sitting here watching the rain fall has caused some musings about the ministry of Billy Graham.

I spoke last Sunday about the shepherds.  There really was a time when they were the most trusted and respected among the professions.  Everybody loved the shepherds.  But that time had changed by the time we get to what is recorded in Luke 2 [+/-].  The image of the shepherd by this time was not the regal David but rogue robbers who would enter a town only to take from it what they could take away by stealth.  They were no longer trusted.  What happened to the shepherds long ago has happened to the “pastoral” ministry in our day.

The word from which we get shepherds and sheep is the same Greek word from which we get the word for “pastor.”  And there was a time both in Europe and America when the pastors were not only the most educated in the community but also the most respected and admired.  Little boys grew up wanting to be pastors.  But that day has long gone.  There are as many charlatans in the pastoral ministry of the church as there are men who are committed to the call of God.  There are as many who are after money as there are those who are after manifesting the Truth of God through His Word.  Follow the ministries of some in our day and the self-centered “gospel” they preach is simply the outward expression of the self-centered lives they are living.  But not Billy.

He has always been and even now continues to be a stalwart standard of integrity.  His ministry has stood the test of time and trial.  He is a man for whom we give praise to God.  His goal has always been to magnify Jesus and to minimize Billy.  But one cannot be on these grounds and not recognize that God’s hand was upon this man.  His ministry will never be replicated; it must be emulated.  He is a worthy model for any man who wants to know what  a God-honoring ministry really looks like.

Sermons David | 07 Dec 2008

They Came, They Saw, They ….

Luke 2:8‐20

There were shepherds in that region.  The NIV has it that they were “living out in the fields.”  Those words are an attempt to capture the flavor of one word here from which we get the prefix “agri. .”  The term is tied to field, to forest and to farm.  These were men who spent the bulk of their time under the sun by day and the moon by night.  Moving from place to place during the day looking for food and water and settling down in safe places for the night.  They saw few humans beyond their small band and heard little conversation beyond the howling chats of hungry wolves looking for wandering sheep during the night.

Learn more about this message by downloading the sermon notes here!

Als Blog Pastor Al | 04 Dec 2008

Liberalism Kills

It really is a grace of God to you and to me that I did not write this post when I was wanting to write it.  I was so angry that I could have bitten a ten penny nail into.  It may have been a better article and more to the point but it would not have been in obedience to Scripture which commands us to love our enemies and it surely would not have been written in the Spirit of Jesus.  The first time I sat to write this post, the phone rang and I had to leave.  Several hours later when I got back to it, I was called away again.  The next time that I sat to write this post with the “steam” still present; I was called away again.  The third time I sat to write this article, I was sitting at a computer in a motel lobby in North Carolina and could not access this particular place.  So, I have finally come to write this post with some better perspective on what I want to say and why I think it needs to be said.

I have thought for years that theolocial liberalism is an atrocious lie of the devil.  And then I would begin to think that it is not really that, but just another way of seeing God, His Word, and His Work in the world.  I would begin to think that liberals are not enemies of the Gospel but men and women who represent another and a different way of viewing the Truth.  I do not need to attack them as those who need to be corrected, but walk alongsisde them as brothers who need to be better informed.  Then again I would read New Testament books like 2 and 3 John, along with Jude; and see how these godly men handled liberal theology.  They did not mince words.  So, I have bounced back and forth over the years:  love them and lead them along as brothers or speak the Truth of God and expose the seduction of Satan that is at the heart of liberalism.  What to do?  How to relate to liberals?

Now let me briefly, oh very briefly; explain what a liberal is.  To get there I need to make two introductory statements.  First, most liberals in SBC life call themselves by a different name.  They are not known as liberals but as “moderates.”  I am reminded of what W. A. Criswell said years ago  about this reality, “people in some parts of the country call a skunk by the name of polecat and vice-versa but they both smell the same.”  Maybe a bit blunt, but I have always wondered even when I was one why we would not want to own what we are.  The theological definitions for liberals and moderates is the same.  The second introductory remark is that many theological liberals are in fact political conservatives.  It is an odd anomaly, but it is true.  It is not my task here to explain why it is true, but it is easy to see and to explain.  But here is the reality put in practical political terms:  many very theologically liberal people are die-hard Republicans when it comes to poliltics.  It is such an odd mixture.

So, who is the liberal?  Well, he is the man or woman whose view of God is defined by the love and grace of God to the exclusion of His holilness and wrath.  Liberals see the wrath of God as an Old Testament concept that is barely to be seen in the New Testament.  Second, the liberal sees the Bible as a book written by humans who were seeking to understand and thus explain God.  It is reliable to the extent that we understand that so much of it is the result of the culture of which it was inescapably a part.  So, what the Bible teaches about everthing from elders to women to sexuality has to be interpreted in light of the culture.  The ultimate criterion for interpreting Scritpure, and this is critical to liberals; is the person and practice of Jesus.  It is equally important to understand that for the liberal,  who Jesus is, is superior to what the Bible says so that, for example, Paul can say that women are to be submissive to men in the church and in the home, but the liberal will argue that that teaching contradicts what we see in the life and ministry of Jesus so that Jesus trumps Paul here.  I could go on and on with these kinds of supercilious views.  Liberals are divided today on the homosexual issues even in Baptist life.  Some in the liberal Cooperative Baptist Fellowship would support homosexuality as an inevitably genetically induced way of being that is acceptable so long as the person is either celibate or engaged in a monogamous relationship while others are still struggling with this issue.  This raises, at least among Baptist liberals, the most powerful and problematical piece of their perspective, what they call “the priesthood of the believer.”

Now what needs to be understood here is that this precious doctrine historically is “the priesthood of all or every believer (s).”  It simply means that our access to God is not through a priest but through Jesus alone, and that we do not need a priest to pray for us or to forgive us, we are “priests to each other.”  The perverted form of this precious doctrine held tenaciously by liberals is that each person can interpret the Bible for himself.  It can mean for us whatever we make it to mean.  We let it inform us as we read it as a part of a our culture and context.  The result is that we make the Bible fit into the framework of our lives as we understand life to be.  So, for example, if  I want to belive in evolution then I read Genesis 1-2 [+/-] as a simple story without any connection to how God created the world.  In doing that I am effectively dismissing the a fundamental way fo understanding these texts that has been in existence for almost two thousand years.  I am exchanging the truth of God for a lie or I am exchanging how the Bible has been understood for years with how I want to understand the Bible.  What a travesty of the Truth of God.  What a tragedy!

Here is where my temperature rises.  In recent weeks I have talked with two or three very lonely and very empty people.  I have spoken with these persons at different times and in different places but the stories are the same.  They went like this:  I grew up in a Bible-believing church.  I went off to college.  I was required to take a Bible course.  By the end of that course, they had taken away everything that I had ever believed.  Can I give you a parenthesis here?  When I was a liberal and taught at a liberal college and seminary, I was told that my task was to to destroy what was learned in Sunday School so that we could rebuild into the students the truth of the historical-critical method.  What  a travesty.  In each situation described above, tears flowed.  Gratitude was expressed for preaching and teaching that is showing them the Truth of the Word of God.  One spoke of wandering around in a desert and not knowing where to turn because of losing the anchor for his life when the professors told him that what he had always believed was not true.  How many are in our church like these?  How many in our community?  Oh, make no mistake about it:  liberalism does not bring life.  It may bring what some see as a sense of freedom.  It allows people to live socially as they please while thinking they have real relationship with God.  But don’t be fooled.  Liberalism kills.  It creates a “god” who is not “God” at all.  Thanks for hearing me out on this one.  And pray that we who love God and His inerrant Word would be faithful in loving and praying for our friends who have been led astray by “gods’ that are in fact demons.

Als Blog Pastor Al | 01 Dec 2008

Leftovers

One of the nice things about the holidays is the food.  It seems that we both cook too much and eat too much and have plenty left over.  Then we eat the leftovers for many days after the family and friends have gone from our home.  Leftovers can often be better than the first taste.  It is sometimes true for me as it was this past Thanksgiving Day that I am so busy doing the things that are necessary to get a meal ready that eating and enjoying what I am eating are not really possible.  So, I look forward to the leftovers.

I have them every week following Sunday.  No preacher can preach all the material that comes out of a week of preparation for Sunday.  Any man who is lacking for material on Sunday is a man who is spening far too little time in prayer and preparation.  I never get to the end of a Sunday Sermon without having what I deem to be significant material that has been left out and thus becomes “leftovers.’  Let me share just a couple of these with you from this past Sunday.

We began our Advent Journey this year in the Gospel of Luke.  We are raising a question during this Advent and going to the text to find the answers:  “what did people do when they saw Jesus; how did they respond?”  The thesis for this series is that however they responded in that day should shape how we respond in our own day.  God is still making Himself known to us as Sovereign and as Savior.  We are told that through the  Scriptures we have a more certain word from God than did those who heard from God in those days.  More certain even than what the Shepherds received.  So, it is not true that we would have been as responsive as were the shepherds had we seen what they saw and heard what they heard.  We have been given a revelation from God that is more definitive than what was declared to them.  We are without excuse when we do not respond to what the Word of God declares about the Savior who has come.

We looked Sunday at how the angels responded.  We sought to establish the context in which we are told that a “registration” was ordered by Caesar Augustus and this was the “first” registration while Quirinius was governor of Syria.  I went right by that due to lack of time.  But here is a place that liberals seek to lambaste the doctrine of  inerrancy.  We know that Jesus was born during the time of  Herod who died in  4 B.C.; we also know that Quirinius was governing in Syria around A.D. 6-7.  So the liberals say that here is a place where the Scripture is just not accurate.  What they fail to note is that the word for “first” holds the key.  It is found in this reference and combined with the word for birth is used in reference to Jesus as the “firstborn.”  It does not here or elsewhere denote anything of numerical value.  The meaning is not that this registration was the first to be followed by a second etc. no more than firstborn means that Jesus is simply one son of others to which Mary gave birth with all of them being equal.  “Firstborn” signifies uniqueness and speaks of one who is special and set apart in every way.  So, the word “first” in relationship to the registration simply means that this registration was the foundation or template for other registrations.  Now we know that the registration during the rule of Quirinius was particularly painful and problematic so that the reference here is simply that this registration was the foundational registration and it happened prior to the ruinous registration of Quirinius.

The other issue that I just did not have time to develop is the reality that the peace that Jesus brings to earth comes through those whom God reconciles to Himself through Jesus.  Every person who belongs to God is by God’s design and for God’s delight a peacemaker.  It is one of the manifest distinctives of the people of God in the household of faith.  Does it then surprise us that the world has little attraction to the church when so many local bodies of believers are not marked by peace but by power plays among the people?  Would you agree that such people in such churches may have seen something, but it wasn’t Jesus?  He is the one who brings us peace and makes us men and women of peace in every relationship in which we are engaged.  There is peace where Jesus reigns and rules.  This peace is not the absence of conflict but it is contentment in the midst of conflict.  I think even now as I write these words of so many whom I love whose hearts are so conflicted during this season due to unexplainable episodes in their lives.  How can they know peace?  They can “know peace” the only way anyone can:  through trusting Jesus who is always faithful.  The slogan is right:  Know Him and Know Peace, Know Him Not and No Peace.