Als Class David | 20 Mar 2010

Daniel 11:1-28

Print This Post Print This Post
James Montgomery Boice reminds us that Daniel 11 [+/-] is the longest and most detailed prophesy in the entire book.  It begins and 11:1 and extends through 12:4.  We must remember as we approach this chapter and the culmination of this book that Daniel is in exile during the sixth century B.C. and is writing here in detail of events that will begin to take place one hundred years after the time in which he is writing.  Boice has noted that this chapter can be divided into three units:  the period of time from Daniel to the time of Antiochus IV, the critical career of Antiochus and the events that are yet to come.  Every student of the Book of Daniel is challenged by this chapter with reference to the issue of the inerrancy and infallibility of Scripture.  Conservative evangelicals have taken the position that God revealed detailed historical truth to Daniel before it came to be; liberal scholars have taken the position that the Book of Daniel was written in the second century B.C. looking back on these events and writing as if they are yet to be.  Which of these positions do you take?

Read more here! »

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • TwitThis
  • MySpace
  • email

Als Class David | 10 Feb 2010

Daniel 9:20-27

Print This Post Print This Post

I. The Context for the Communication of the Word of God, 9:20-23

A. One of the very real passions for the people of God in every period is the passion to hear the voice of God. We want God to speak to us. We desire desperately to hear His voice. One of the very visceral evidences of being a true child of God is this deep hunger and thirst to hear from heaven. One of the great devices of the devil, however; is to get us to detour from the main road that must be travelled if we are to hear God’s voice.

B. We have already seen in the previous verses of this chapter that God spoke to Daniel through His Word while Daniel was seeking God in serious study and in earnest prayer. In our context, we would say that Daniel was seeking God on His knees as he read the Bible. This is how God spoke to Daniel. This is how God speaks to us. This is how God speaks to His people in every age. The study of the Bible is hard work. It takes devotion and discipline. This is why the deliberate investment of our lives in Bible Study is so very important. It compels us into the discipline of the dedicated and daily study of the Word of God. And this is how we hear the Word of God.
Read more here! »

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • TwitThis
  • MySpace
  • email

Als Class David | 18 Dec 2009

Daniel 9

Print This Post Print This Post
Daniel 9 [+/-]
The interpretation of the Book of Daniel from an apocalyptic perspective depends almost entirely on the understanding of the seventy weeks in Daniel 9 [+/-]. Thus, at the outset of our study of this chapter we need to be clear about several very critical realities:
1. Although this chapter is as inerrant and as infallible as any other in the book, we must no more make our ability to hear the message of Daniel hinge on getting the seventy weeks right than we should make our understanding of the Book of Revelation hinge on our understanding of the millennium. The latter is just one small paragraph in a book of twenty-two chapters and the seventy weeks here is s small part of one of twelve chapters. So, let’s keep this issue in its proper perspective. There are those who are strong believers and good, solid Bible interpreters who see this passage limited to the time of Antiochus Epiphanes and no later than A.D. 70 as well as equally gifted interpreters who see this text tied almost totally to the end of time.
2. This text has as much to teach us about the study of the Word of God and prayer as it does about the character of the seventy weeks. We will be greatly benefitted by what this chapter teaches us about prayer.
3. The two keys to understanding this chapter are the texts that Daniel studied to get the number of seventy years and the meaning of Daniel 7:24 [+/-]. We will begin our study of this chapter with these two issues.
I. Three Major Views of the Seventy Weeks
Daniel Nine is the key to prophetic interpretation and the backbone of prophesy, James Boice
I am going to present the three basic views of the seventy weeks of Daniel below. It is important, however, to remember that all the views emerge out of one of two understandings of the material in Daniel, and this same approach is applicable to Revelation. What determines the approach to the book is whether the weeks are seen as “symbolic” or “literalistic.” Symbolic interpretation does not require exactness in dating; literalistic interpretation does.
A. The first view is that the seventy weeks refers entirely to events surrounding he reign of Antiochus Epiphanes IV from 175-164 B.C. This view is the most difficult to establish since marking 490 years from either 605 B.C. or 586 B.C. does not take us near the time of Antiochus. Even more difficult is fitting the key text of 9:24 into the framework of the period of Antiochus Epiphanes.
B. The second view takes the numbers symbolically and figuratively and does not tie them to any time frame at all. The arguments are rooted in the common use of number symbolism in apocalyptic literature so that 7 X 70 would be a perfectly complete period of time which would in effect be “kairos” and not “chromos” or time as it is useful in serving God’s purposes known only to Him which He works out in His own time. Most scholars, however, who take this view would suggest that it most likely refers to the time from the exile to the time of Christ with the “seventieth” week taking us through the ministry, death, and resurrection of Jesus. By the way, one of the issues that this view raises that all interpreters of the Book of Daniel and the Book of Revelation have to face is the issue of symbolism vs. literalism. We can know that a person is captured more by his or her theological system when he uses numbers symbolically and then literally depending on which way of seeing them assists the strengthening of his system. Yet, this way of using the numbers should cause us to stand away from any system that would interpret the numbers first one way and then another.
C. The third view holds that the seventy weeks refers to events around the time of Christ with the last set of seven referring to the end time. The issue for this view is two-fold. First, what is the starting date for the seventy years that culminate at the time of Christ and what date do we use for the point of culmination? If we use 538 B.C. when Cyrus gave the edict for the Jews to return to Jerusalem (2 Chron. 36:23 [+/-], Ezra 1:2-4 [+/-]) this would yield a date of 48 B.C. which has no significance at all. Another possibility is the edict of Artaxerxes (Ezra 7:12-26 [+/-]) in 458 B.C. which takes us to A.D. 33. This calculation also makes Dan. 9:24 [+/-] make sense. One other view is when Nehemiah was given letters from King Artaxerxes in 445 B.C. to begin the rebuilding of the walls of the cities of Jerusalem. This approach, of course, assumes that the numbers are to be understood literalistically and that the dates in the Bible that we construct by attaching them to certain events are exact.
I do need to mention here the view of John MacArthur which makes the most sense of this third view. MacArthur says that if we use the figure of 70 weeks and remember that Daniel was told that there would be seven weeks from the decree to restore Jerusalem to the coming of an anointed one there would be seven weeks. If we take the decree f Artaxerxes in 444 B.C. and add 49 years to it, that takes us to 395 B.C. and then the Bible says that there would be 62 weeks from that point when the anointed one would be cut off or crucified. This would be 434 years with a year added for the transition year so that we are taken to A.D. 40 or to A.D. 33 and the crucifixion of Jesus plus seven years during which the Jewish and Gentile Mission of the church was clearly established.
II. Daniel 9:1-2 [+/-] and 24 as keys
A. Daniel 9:1-2 [+/-] is the first key. Daniel is studying the Book of Jeremiah and comes to a conclusion about the number of the years of captivity. It seems that Daniel would have been studying Jeremiah 25:1-13 [+/-] and 29:1-14. These texts ought to be carefully read and closely studied. Please pay close attention when reading Jeremiah 29 [+/-] as verse 11 is one of the most misapplied texts in the Bible. It was written as a promise of God to people who were under His judgment and the promise is to them only as they belong to Him. It is not at all about them and what they deserve after their pain; it is all about God and what He gives and does in spite of the pain.
B. Daniel 9:24 [+/-]. It is important to read verses 20-23 as the foundation for verse 24. We will study these verses as we move through the chapter but they focus for us the importance of this verse. And this verse would lead us to a more literal interpretation so that seventy weeks or years is decreed for the people of God and for the city of God. Now we have to be precise here in deciding whether the people of God or Jewish only or are they Jews and Gentile and is the city of God the real Jerusalem of the symbolic city of the saints of God, and we must not mix and match here. I believe that the word here is for the Jewish people and the city is the city of Jerusalem so that what follows if first and foundationally for them. And then when we read this text we see that there are six statements here with the first three very clearly focused on the first coming of Jesus and the second three very clearly focused on the second coming of Jesus.
1. The First Advent of Jesus is for:
a. Finishing the Transgression
b. Putting an end to sin
c. Atoning for iniquity
The focus for the first coming of Jesus is His cross; His sacrificial atoning death for sin. Now, if we go to a text like Luke and look at it from the perspective of what is being said here and in the context of the vocabulary that is used we see how the Bible is not only inherent but so very coherent. Look at Luke 2:10-11 [+/-]. The word for “people” in verse 10 is a word that in Luke always refers to the Jewish people. The shepherds were Jewish people and the good news is for them and for all Jewish people and the good news is that their Messiah has come and that their Messiah is Lord. Go then to the Book of Acts and see the struggle that the early church had taking the Gospel to the Gentiles and even watch Paul who was called to preach to the Gentiles but who always went first to the synagogue to his own people. The foundational focus of God in the coming of Jesus was the salvation of the Jewish people who were first called of God to be a light to the nations. This means that when Gentile believers are involved in outreach to Jewish people, we are involved in that which represents the very heart of God.
2. The Second Advent of Jesus is for:
a. Bringing in everlasting righteousness
b. To finish the vision of Daniel
c. To anoint the most Holy Place
Here again if this holy place is tied to the holy people then the focus must be the city of Jerusalem where the Temple will be rebuilt with a splendor unknown since the days of Herod and all the nations will flow toward Jerusalem for either ultimate salvation or ultimate condemnation. Read Zechariah 14:16-21 [+/-] for what is a prophetic understanding of the centrality of the city of Jerusalem and the reinstituted festival of booths or tabernacles that will be observed there in the last of the last days.
Now with this as a background and context we turn our attention to the three movements of Daniel Nine. We will look first at the focus of his study (9:1-2), then the faithfulness of his prayer, (9:3-19) and finally at the fulfillment of His prophesy (9:20-27).

The interpretation of the Book of Daniel from an apocalyptic perspective depends almost entirely on the understanding of the seventy weeks in Daniel 9 [+/-]. Thus, at the outset of our study of this chapter we need to be clear about several very critical realities:

1. Although this chapter is as inerrant and as infallible as any other in the book, we must no more make our ability to hear the message of Daniel hinge on getting the seventy weeks right than we should make our understanding of the Book of Revelation hinge on our understanding of the millennium. The latter is just one small paragraph in a book of twenty-two chapters and the seventy weeks here is s small part of one of twelve chapters. So, let’s keep this issue in its proper perspective. There are those who are strong believers and good, solid Bible interpreters who see this passage limited to the time of Antiochus Epiphanes and no later than A.D. 70 as well as equally gifted interpreters who see this text tied almost totally to the end of time.

Read more here! »

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • TwitThis
  • MySpace
  • email

Als Class Pastor Al | 27 Oct 2009

Daniel 8

Print This Post Print This Post

INTRODUCTION: The Book of Daniel shifts from Hebrew to Aramaic in 2:4-7:28 and here shifts back to Hebrew. The most likely explanation for this shift is that the use of Aramaic would enable many Gentiles to hear and to read the message so that the portion in Aramaic would be for the Gentile audience. Now with the opening of Daniel 8 [+/-], the attention turns back to the Jewish people.

This chapter is a straightforward declaration of a vision and its interpretation.
Read more here! »

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • TwitThis
  • MySpace
  • email

Als Class Pastor Al | 27 Oct 2009

Daniel 7

Print This Post Print This Post

INTRODUCTION:  We shift from historical to “trans-historical” narrative with the opening of chapter seven.  We are moving from a context in history that we can carefully explore to a context beyond history that we can trust because everything that Daniel will teach us about what is to be is rooted in what has been and is confirmed by the Book of Revelation which means that a document that was written in the seventh century B.C. and a document written in A.D. 95 by different writers in different times are carefully connected in what they communicate about the future.
Read more here! »

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • TwitThis
  • MySpace
  • email

Als Class Pastor Al | 22 Sep 2009

Daniel 6 (part 2)

Print This Post Print This Post
I. The Identity of Darius, 5:30 and 6:1-2

A. A lot of ambiguity surrounds the exact identity of this king. Most have believed and still do that Darius the Mede and Cyrus the Persian are the same person. The Babylonian empire gave way to the Medo-Persian empire and it was not uncommon for people to have differing names based upon the culture in which they were involved, e.g. the Hebrew and Babylonian names for Daniel. Thus, it is most likely that Darius and Cyrus are the same person. Read more here! »

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • TwitThis
  • MySpace
  • email

Als Class David | 20 Sep 2009

Daniel 6

Print This Post Print This Post
I. The Identity of Darius, 5:30 and 6:1-2

A. A lot of ambiguity surrounds the exact identity of this king. Most have believed and still do that Darius the Mede and Cyrus the Persian are the same person. The Babylonian empire gave way to the Medo-Persian empire and it was not uncommon for people to have differing names based upon the culture in which they were involved, e.g. the Hebrew and Babylonian names for Daniel. Thus, it is most likely that Darius and Cyrus are the same person. Read more here! »

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • TwitThis
  • MySpace
  • email

Als Class Pastor Al | 30 Jul 2009

Daniel 4:1-37

Print This Post Print This Post

One of the most amazing things about the work of God in our lives is the way He reveals Himself to us so as to move us along in our understanding of Him. He is doing that with King Nebuchadnezzar here in the Book of Daniel. And when we come to the opening verses of this chapter we hear the King giving the most exalted exclamation about the character of God that has yet been given. Now we must be careful here: Exalted exclamations about God do not save us and they may well speak to our experience of God in a given circumstance of life. They do not necessarily constitute to core of who we are in relationship to God. What are some other biblical instances where we see people being brought along by God in their understanding of God? Read more here! »

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • TwitThis
  • MySpace
  • email

Als Class Pastor Al | 03 Jul 2009

Daniel 3:1-30

Daniel 3:1-30 [+/-]
INTRODUCTION:  Two major truths emerge out of this chapter.  First, God is showing us how Nebuchadnezzar is being brought to an increasingly dawning awareness of how great and mighty is the God of Israel.  The book opens with God showing the king that He has the ability to show his servants the meaning of dreams and the King honors God.  This chapter will go a step further and this king will acknowledge God as the One who is above and over all the other gods and then in chapter four God will be acknowledged as the great King whose kingdom is an everlasting Kingdom.  The second truth that emerges out of this chapter is the response of the three to the king that God is able to deliver them but even if He does not it is because He wills not to deliver them and they will serve God in accordance with His will.  What these three say to the king belongs among those great sayings of the Bible such as Mordecai reminding Esther that her going to the king in behalf of her people may in fact cost her her life, but God may well have brought her to Persia for such a time as this.
I.  The Golden Image:  The Power of Idolatry  3:1-7
A.  The image of gold signifies the King’s own interpretation of the dream.  He makes the image entirely of gold to assert his absolute supremacy over every king that has come before him and every king that will come after him.  He is saying that his is the eternal and everlasting kingdom.  Babylon will be forever!
1.  The size of the image and the space upon which it is placed both speak volumes about the arrogance of the king.  The statue was ninety feet high and nine feet wide.  This is no small image, and all of pure gold.  It was both very expansive and very expensive.  The plain of Dura where the image was placed was located about six miles south of Babylon and is roughly equivalent to the location of the plain in Shinar where the tower of Babel was built (Genesis 11 [+/-]).  This tower was built for two purposes:  to assert their own power and to keep themselves from being scattered over all the earth.  They wanted something to keep them together so that they could move forward in pursuing their own purpose.  What was the plan on plain of Shinar is the same as the plain of Dura and both are frustrated by God.
B.  Nebuchadnezzar gathered all the leading officials and all the leading musicians.  It is no accident that the number for the list of officials and the number for the musicians is seven.  Nebuchadnezzar has created a sovereign image and has as he sees it the perfect plan to consolidate his power and the power of his kingdom for years to come.  We know something of what the king was thinking from a document that has been recovered from this period that reads, “beside my statue as king I wrote and inscription mentioning my name I erected for posterity.  May future kings respect the monument, remember the praise of the gods.  He who respects my royal name who does not abrogate my statues, change my decrees, his throne shall be secure, his life last long, his dynasty shall continue.”
II.  The Fiery Furnace, 3:8-30
A.  The Accusation, 3:8-12.  The key to this section is the word “maliciously” in verse 8.  What makes the accusation and malicious accusation?  We must read this account in conjunction with accounts like Esther and Joseph etc. because what is the essence of “malicious” here is the essence of “malicious” everywhere else.  And every one of us is very capable of it.
1.  The phrase “the Jews” indicates an animosity toward these men that was there and had been building.  Were they jealous of them?  Was there position a threat to these men?  Who is it in our lives that evokes this kind of suspicion?
2.  They are too affirming of the king and his authority.  They come to him with compliments but are not so sure of what he might do so that they remind  him of his decree.  They know what they want and they know what they must do to get it.  This is manipulation at its most marvelous.  Do we do this kind of thing when we want something from somebody so we have one person go to the other to say one thing and another go to say another so we can get that person to do what we want them to do.  If this kind of thing was sinful then, why isn’t it sinful any more?
3.  They accuse the Jews of ingratitude and impiety, 12.  He has given them leading positions and they neither honor him nor his gods.
B.  The Confrontation  3:13-25
1.  Here we come face to face with the focal point of this passage.  Nebuchadnezzar is in a rage and confronts the three. He gives them an opportunity to repent but they use the opportunity to respond to him out of who they are as children of God.
2.  Their response found in verses 16-18 includes three elements.  First, they want him to know that they do not have to respond to him.  He is not their king.  They are owned by another.  They will give him the courtesy of a response but they are not compelled to respond.  Second, they do not ever doubt that God is able to deliver them.  He can throw them in and He can snatch them out.  Third, they are submissive to His will which could be deliverance or destruction but either way they remain decisively devoted to God.  Isaiah 43:1-7 [+/-].
3.  Nebuchadnezzar is in a rage and orders the furnace heated to seven times what is normal and he ordered the three men to be bound and thrown into the furnace.  One of the supreme ironies here is that those whose lives were being lost were saved and those whose lives were being saved were in fact destroyed.  So fierce was the heat that when the men threw them in, the men were killed.
4.  The king saw a fourth man in the fire and recognized him as one like a son of the gods.  What about his appearance caused him to come to this conclusion?
C.  The Culmination, 3:26-30
1.  Nebuchadnezzar called out the three men and affirmed them as servants of the Most High God.  This term is the highest affirmation that he has yet used of God.  What he king sees along with all the other officials is that the fire had not harmed them, their hair was not singed, and their clothes had no smell of smoke.  Nebuchadnezzar affirms who they are as the servants of he Most High God.
2.  Nebuchadnezzar blesses their God as the one who sent his angel to deliver them because they chose to obey their God rather than men.  He honors their God by issuing a warning against anyone who would dare to speak anything against the god of these three.
3.  Nebuchanezzar promoted these men to an even more prominent place.
Print This Post Print This Post

INTRODUCTION:  Two major truths emerge out of this chapter.  First, God is showing us how Nebuchadnezzar is being brought to an increasingly dawning awareness of how great and mighty is the God of Israel.  The book opens with God showing the king that He has the ability to show his servants the meaning of dreams and the King honors God.  This chapter will go a step further and this king will acknowledge God as the One who is above and over all the other gods and then in chapter four God will be acknowledged as the great King whose kingdom is an everlasting Kingdom.  The second truth that emerges out of this chapter is the response of the three to the king that God is able to deliver them but even if He does not it is because He wills not to deliver them and they will serve God in accordance with His will.  What these three say to the king belongs among those great sayings of the Bible such as Mordecai reminding Esther that her going to the king in behalf of her people may in fact cost her her life, but God may well have brought her to Persia for such a time as this.

I.  The Golden Image:  The Power of Idolatry  3:1-7

A.  The image of gold signifies the King’s own interpretation of the dream.  He makes the image entirely of gold to assert his absolute supremacy over every king that has come before him and every king that will come after him.  He is saying that his is the eternal and everlasting kingdom.  Babylon will be forever! Read more here! »

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • TwitThis
  • MySpace
  • email

Als Class David | 17 Jun 2009

Daniel 2:1-30

Print This Post Print This Post
Daniel 2:1-30 [+/-]
INTRODUCTION:  Daniel One takes us immediately into the conflict that is found in every era between those who are committed to God and those who are not.  Make no mistake about this reality:  the Prince of the power of the air, Satan himself; wants to “brain wash” all who will listen to his ways.  He wants us to profess both a love for and honor for God while living to gratify our fleshly desires as they are fed and fueled by the ways of the world.  Those who live this way can be most sure that they do not belong to God but are most often the most boastfully confident that they do.  Daniel and his friends show us clearly that commitment is real and radical, and it is risky.
As we turn now to chapter two, we begin to see God’s sovereign hand setting up the situation that will show us as God’s people how we are to act as His people when we are in conflict with the world and its ways.
I.  The Dream and the Dilemma that is Created by the Dream, 2:1-11
A.  King Nebuchadnezzar has a dream.  We are told three things in verse one that produce one response:
1.  The Dream
2.  The Troubled Spirit
3.  The Loss of Sleep
This was no positive vision in the night but a nightmare that troubled the king and roused him from his sleep.  The most powerful man on the planet who sleeps in his palace surrounded by military might cannot sleep because a power greater than any has disturbed him during the night.
B.  He commands all of those who have any power to help him to come to his side.  Let me show you the three groups that he calls in and then let’s see what they all have in common:
1.  The magicians (magoi) are astrologers for whom life was found in the stars.  They sought guidance that was “metaphysical.”
2.  The enchanters were those who would sleep the mind and refocus the energies of a person in a more proper direction.  Life was directed through the control of the mind.  They would be modern day “hypnotists.”
3.  The sorcerers (pharmakos) would manipulate the spirits in order to find direction in life.  This would develop into the management of herbs as a means of remedy for the body but at this stage it involved the manipulation of the spirit world.
The word that follows in most translations is “Chaldeans” which could mean that all of these who were called were Chaldeans or this could be a special class of dream interpreters who were specialists in understanding Chaldean culture and could function much like anthropologists, sociologists, or psychoanalysts.  Notice that one group looked to the stars, one to the spirits, and one to the “psyche.”  They all had the following in common:
1.  They were considered in their day to be very religious; they were treated by many as priests of a religious order;
2.  These men would have had the influence in their day that the medical community has in our day; these were not considered to be “quacks.”
3.  These men were seen as men who had contact with the “gods” who revealed to these men what these men most needed to know.
C.  They have here a dilemma that they had never faced before:  the king wants them to tell him both the dream and its interpretation, 3-9.  Please note that the Book of Daniel is written from 2:4 through the end of chapter seven in Aramaic.  We do not know exactly why that happened.
D.  The response of those summoned is the key to this particular passage.  These men who are the most trusted men in their culture speak what sets the stage for the rest of the book:
1.  No human being can do what the King is asking; it would require a special kind of knowledge that human beings do not have.  It is an admission of human finitude and limitation.  Those who sought knowledge for guidance in life from all kinds of sources are saying that there are some things that they do not know.
2.  What the king is asking us new and different.  This has never happened before.  There must be some reason that this taking place in this way.  The reason is still hidden and soon to be revealed.
3.  The only entity in the universe who can do what the King is asking is a “god.”  It would take someone who is on the earth but not of the earth to do what the King is asking.
II.  The King’s Decision and Daniel’s Response, 2:12-16
A.  The King decided to destroy all the wise men in his kingdom, 12-13.  This decision included Daniel and his friends.  Put yourself in Daniel’s shoes.  How would you respond to the awareness of the coming crisis?
B.  Daniel was calm, 14.  What was the source of his calmness?  He saw the tragedy as an opportunity.  He was conversant in a manner both of seeking information and offering companionship, 15.  Daniel was courageous, 16.  He acted in faith to do what needed to be done.
What follows now is a very critical teaching for us when faced with a “crisis of belief.”  Remember that we learned in Experiencing God that what we do at the intersection of a crisis of belief makes all the difference.  Daniel has trusted God and acted in obedience to His call.  Now he shows us what steps we all must take on the path of walking in obedience to God.
III.  When God calls us to Obey Him and we say, “yes” We then must:  2:17-24
A.  We must share what God is doing with faithful friends who will pray for us and encourage us while helping us clarify the call of God, 17.  What do we most often do when God is calling us in a certain direction particularly if that direction seems “strange” and “unusual?”  How quick are we to share our struggles in our families or those things that we are dealing with in our souls?
B.  He asked his friends to join him in seeking God for a purpose.  Notice the clear focus on seeking God as a precedent and foundation for the purpose.  He is seeking God about not being destroyed but the focus is on seeking God and not on deliverance from being destroyed.
C.  The mystery of the dream and its interpretation was revealed to Daniel in a “vision of the night.”  It came to him in the same time frame that the dream came to Nebuchadnezzar.
D.  Daniel immediately gave praise and thanksgiving to God.
1.  He exalted God who alone has wisdom and might;
2.  He is the ruler of the earth and all that is in it;
3.  He is the sovereign over kings and kingdoms;
4.  He gives both wisdom and knowledge bringing His truth to those to whom He chooses to make it known;
5.  He is worthy of our gratitude and praise and we should give that to Him with great generosity.
6.  He revealed the truth of the dream to Daniel so that all glory and praise is to be given to God.
Note that this prayer is remarkably God-centered.  You and I ought to look carefully at this prayer.  Whatever is the center of concern in our lives is the center of concern in our prayers.  Ask yourself this week in your prayer times:  are my prayers dominated by a deep desire to honor and magnify God no matter the cost to me or others or are my prayers dominated by my desires for myself and others and particularly if those others are limited to a very closely confined circle of family and friends?
E.  Daniel now acts in faith as the faithful servant of God, 24.
Notice the movements in this passage:  conversation, communication, confirmation, celebration, and commitment.
IV.  The Encounter with the King  2:25-30
A.  The perspective of the pagans is proclaimed in verse 25 that the interpretation of the dream is the work of a human.  Daniel’s response tells the truth to the King.
1.  He is an “apologist” for the pagan interpreters; they told the king that no person could do this kind of thing and Daniel affirms their assessment as true, 27.
2.  Notice the “but” in verse 28.  Daniel confesses His faith and gives praise to God.  This God is the one and only God who is the sovereign over the world.  And He has graciously revealed to the king what is about to take place.
3.  Daniel reveals to the king what was given in the dream and gives all the praise and glory to God, 30.  Daniel wants the king to know that this God whom Daniel serves is being gracious to the King.

INTRODUCTION:  Daniel One takes us immediately into the conflict that is found in every era between those who are committed to God and those who are not.  Make no mistake about this reality:  the Prince of the power of the air, Satan himself; wants to “brain wash” all who will listen to his ways.  He wants us to profess both a love for and honor for God while living to gratify our fleshly desires as they are fed and fueled by the ways of the world.  Those who live this way can be most sure that they do not belong to God but are most often the most boastfully confident that they do.  Daniel and his friends show us clearly that commitment is real and radical, and it is risky.

As we turn now to chapter two, we begin to see God’s sovereign hand setting up the situation that will show us as God’s people how we are to act as His people when we are in conflict with the world and its ways.

I.  The Dream and the Dilemma that is Created by the Dream, 2:1-11

A.  King Nebuchadnezzar has a dream.  We are told three things in verse one that produce one response:

1.  The Dream

2.  The Troubled Spirit

3.  The Loss of Sleep Read more here! »

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • TwitThis
  • MySpace
  • email

Als Class Pastor Al | 27 May 2009

The Book of Revelation

Print This Post Print This Post

I.  The Nature and Character of the Book as Apocalyptic

A.  Most unique book in the New Testament and in the canon with the exception of Daniel in the Old Testament.  Uniqueness tied to its clear identity as the “unveiling of Jesus Christ,” 1:1 or as an Apocalypse.

B.  Characteristics of Jewish Apocalyptic Literature

1.  Pseudonymity so that the writer wrote in the name of some ancient and revered person, e.g.;  Baruch, Enoch, etc.  The Book of Revelation is clearly from the apostle John with some suggesting John the Elder but clearly not an unknown writer;

2.  Conflict between the forces of good and evil with the outcome either unknown or known in the end; The Book of Revelation is the celebration of the victory that has been won for us in Jesus Christ.  Even the forces of darkness are under His complete control.

3.  Historical Contexts are contrived so that they have little or no meaning.  The Book of Revelation is written just as the Book of Daniel in a very clear and very precise historical context.

4.  Symbols often function in a variety of ways with a variety of meanings (multivalent) while the symbols in the Book of Revelation have very clear and concrete connections, e.g.; the One who is riding forth on a white horse is very clearly the Lord Jesus Christ. Read more here! »

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • TwitThis
  • MySpace
  • email

Als Class Pastor Al | 26 May 2009

How to Engage the Culture War – Daniel 1:1-21

Print This Post Print This Post

Daniel 1:1-21 [+/-]

I. Some Clean up Issues

A. First, Remember that the approach that I am taking to Daniel and the companion Apocalyptic in the New Testament is the approach of HISTORICAL PREMILLENAILLISM. This means first that the historical context becomes the primary environment for understanding the future so that we interpret what is to be “analogously” by what is given us in the context of the history. Second, this approach means that the church goes through at least some of the Tribulation period if not all so that this approach would not hold to a rapture of the church prior to the Tribulation. Third, this approach sees Israel in a two-fold way: on the one side Israel is an important entity as geo-political-national entity. In other words, the existence of the state of Israel is important to the purposes of God in the end time. Read more here! »

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • TwitThis
  • MySpace
  • email

Als Class Pastor Al | 20 May 2009

The Book of Daniel: Study One

Print This Post Print This Post
INTRODUCTION:  The reforms among the people of God have always been generational.  What happens in one generation is no guarantee for either good or evil to happen in the next generation.  This does not mean, however, that what we do in one generation determines what is going to happen in the next except insofar as it conforms to the sovereign plan and purpose of God.  Such is the history that leads us to the period of the Book of Daniel.

Read more here! »

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • TwitThis
  • MySpace
  • email