Als Class Pastor Al | 26 May 2009 01:41 pm
How to Engage the Culture War – Daniel 1:1-21
Print This Post
I. Some Clean up Issues
A. First, Remember that the approach that I am taking to Daniel and the companion Apocalyptic in the New Testament is the approach of HISTORICAL PREMILLENAILLISM. This means first that the historical context becomes the primary environment for understanding the future so that we interpret what is to be “analogously†by what is given us in the context of the history. Second, this approach means that the church goes through at least some of the Tribulation period if not all so that this approach would not hold to a rapture of the church prior to the Tribulation. Third, this approach sees Israel in a two-fold way: on the one side Israel is an important entity as geo-political-national entity. In other words, the existence of the state of Israel is important to the purposes of God in the end time.
This does not mean, however, that all who are in the state of Israel will be saved in the end nor does it mean that all who are ethnically Israel will be saved. Israel is thus defined in two ways: on the one side is the State of Israel composed of those who belong to God and those who do not and on the other side is the Israel of God or all who have been brought into a relationship with God through His grace by way of the gift of salvation which comes through Jesus Christ.
B. Second, your approach to Israel is a part of your understanding of the end times. And there are three approaches that have historically been taken:
1. All Israel refers to all Jews so that all Jews will be saved. This would mean that God has two ways of saving people. One is through Jesus and the other is by being Jewish.
2. All Israel refers to the church so that Israel is a code word for the people of God so that our approach to the state of Israel is defined by what is politically feasible and not by anything biblical since from this perspective this issue is not addressed in the Bible.
3. All Israel is used in two senses with one having to do with the State of Israel and the other with the saved who are the people of God or the New Israel. It is this last one that characterizes my approach to this issue.
C. Third, I want to try to clarify my concluding remark in our last session about the Roman Catholic Church. I recently had lunch with a man who is a Roman Catholic who loves Jesus and is devoted to Jesus. But as I told him, I have struggles with some of the beliefs of the church and the most important of those with which I struggle is the issue of how a person becomes right and is kept right with God. We believe that we are justified by grace through faith and we are kept in right relationship with God in the same way. In other words, God calls us into a relationship with Him and gives us what we need to commit our lives to Him so as to begin a life of living under the Lordship of Jesus and the evidence of God’s work in us is seen in our devotion driven by desire to become by God’s grace all that God wants us to be. This is not the teaching of the Roman Catholic Church.
The RCC teaches that we are set apart for God through baptism and that as an infant but we are justified before God through those things that we do in and through the church that make us right with God. And if we don’t do enough in this life then we can have those who will pray us through purgatory so as to have us finally arrive at the justified state and thus enter paradise. In other words, justification does not precede sanctification as the free gift of God but follows sanctification as the means by which we become right with God through the works that we do in this life or the works that are done for us after this life that will in time release us from purgatory into paradise. That view in my opinion is not what the Bible teaches and the Roman Catholics that I know who are born again believers do not hold that view even though they continue to be a part of a church that does.
That is what I meant by calling the RCC an apostate church. But let me be very quick to add that liberal Protestant churches are as apostate as are Roman Catholic Churches. So my agenda is not anti-RCC but desiring to measure the meaning of church by biblical standards.
II. The Historical Context, 1:1-3
A. What God had prophesied through His prophets was now coming to pass; Babylon was invading Jerusalem and taking both possessions and people. Both in the earliest phases were of the finest sort. They were not after everything at first; they wanted to paralyze the place and her people by taking away the very best. How would someone who wanted to take over country go about it if their first focus was the first among places and possessions and the finest among the people? How would you go about changing the immediate condition of the country and the course of the culture? Babylon was after both these realties.
III. How to Change the Course of a Culture, 1:4-7
I just finished reading the summer issue of The Southern Baptist Journal of Theology that chronicles the 150 year history of THE Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, Kentucky. Reading about those horrific years of liberal leanings was so hard for me but it reminded me that in my short stint as a faculty member teaching Greek hearing faculty members talk about the goal of a three year program of study: the first year was about unlearning, the second was about new learning, and the third was about solidifying that new learning so as to send out students who were committed to the liberal/moderate agenda both in terms of the Bible and the Convention.
What we have in these verse is critical. They show us how Satan works to change the course of a culture. Pay close attention.
A. Target the youth, 4a. But not just any youth. Satan wants the brightest and the best. Look at the list of characteristics for the kind of children and youth for whom they were looking:
1. Morally decent or without blemish;
2. Good looking Guys;
3. Good discernment or skills in handling information
4. Knowing what education is and how to go about learning
5. Comfortable in the context of the palace and the university
B. Teach the Youth what you want them to know; Control the Curriculum so that you communicate what is true. Do you know that there is so much evidence for at least the teaching of Intelligent Design that is not allowed to be taught in many school systems? Why would we not allow this view to be taught since it undeniable that is scientifically viable? It is not allowed for the same reason that from a conservative perspective we do not want to teach that most of the founding fathers were deists and not men who were deeply devoted to God in the sense that you and I would understand what it means to be deeply devoted to God. But what do you teach the youth when you are wanting to change the course of your culture?
1. The literature that you want them to know; Here the reference is to history slanted to one perspective or literature written from one view only. Get your college reading list for your students and you will know what the angle is from which they are being taught.
2. The language that is the language of the culture. Language is the symbol carrying system of the culture. Culture has its lingua franca and its subcultural systems that is often found in the music of the subcultures.
3. The lifestyle of the culture. Teach them how to live by showing them what to eat and drink. Bring their taste for food and fine wine in to alignment with the language they are speaking and the books they are reading. It was no accident, for example, that in my early years of seminary when I was learning liberal theology that I also developed a taste for different foods and fine wines as well as wanting to learn to speak in a way that was not distinctively “southern.â€
These are the three basic ways that Satan works in a culture to change the worldview of her people. And the place where this is prominent and paramount in our culture is on the campuses of our colleges and universities. You will not send a child to a public university and most private universities without them being radically changed unless they are really grounded in the Word of God before they go. Parents had better think seriously about this issue; there is where modern Babylon exists.
C. Take three years and then let the King determine whether or not they have arrived at degree status, 1:5. Seminary takes three years and a modern university without any breaks for summer would take about that amount of time.
IV. How to Remain Faithful to God in this kind of Context, 1:6-21
A. We must know who we are so that when someone tries to change our identity, we are clear about who we are regardless of what others say or do, 1:6-7 Daniel means, “God is my judge.†Hanniah means “The Lord is Gracious.†Mishael means, “who is what God is?†and Azariah, “The Lord is a helper.†Remember that names meant far more in that day than in ours; the name represented the essence of the identity of the person who bore the name. This is why the question of Moses to God in Exodus 3 [+/-] is so very critical, “what is Your Name?†Their names were changed to Bayblonian names that invoked the Babylonian deities Marduk, Bel, and Nebo.
B. We must resolve to live in commitment to who we are as the people of God, 1:8. The idea here is not that found in our first of the year resolutions. The idea here is the kind of commitment that comes out of an awareness of our identity. It would be something like this, “Because by God’s grace and His tender mercy manifest in the sacrifice of His Son for my sins, I resolve to live in the following ways so as to represent well who my God is and what my God has done for me: and what would some of the ways be?
C. Note the connection between verses 8 and 9. God’s favor was granted to Daniel because of Daniel’s faithfulness to God. Let me emphasize yet again that this basic Biblical pattern is never altered. We experience God’s presence and power in direct relationship to our determination to be devoted particularly when that devotion can be costly. It was here. It always is.
D. We must trust God and do what He tells us to do in a way that bears a winsome witness to those who would will and want us to do otherwise. Notice how gracious Daniel is to the representative of Nebuchanezzar. He is not defiant about what he is going to do. He trusts His God and asks for grace from the Babylonian official, 1:9-16.
V. God’s gift to Daniel and His friends in this difficult situation, 1:17-21
A. God gave them what they needed to learn the language and the literature while giving Daniel skill through visions and dreams to see correctly what was coming at them, 1:17. When we are being inundated by our culture we must have someone in our lives that can help us sort it so as to see it for what it is.
B. God enabled these four to be the finest and the fullest of knowledge among all who had been brought to Babylon. Do not ever think that being Biblical in your understanding is a defection to being dumb. That is what our culture communicates. The serious and saturated study of God’s work will produce with brilliant insight into what is going on in the world. The Bible is the Book from the hand of the One who created everything that is. Why would we ever think that knowledge of a University Science text would make us smarter than knowledge of the Bible? You better know the answer to that question by now!!. In fact we are told that when they stood before the king, 19; they were ten times or totally and completely more intelligent than any who were in Babylon.
C. The final verse is a frame for the first verse which tells us when Daniel came and how long he stayed which was in fact the 70 years of captivity in Babylon. Daniel was an old man when he went back to Jerusalem; the bulk of his years were spent in foreign land as are the bulk of our years when we recognize who we really are and where home really is.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.