Als Blog Pastor Al | 29 Jun 2008 03:39 pm

A More In-Depth look at TULIP

I want to begin our journey through TULIP with three caveats.  First, this acrostic represents a theological system which like other theological systems is an attempt to understand and put in perspective what is revealed in the Bible.  And like any other system, it has those who understand and articulate its tenets well and those whose understanding of the system is simply for the purpose of attacking and dismantling the system.  My goal is simply to be as fair to John Calvin as I can be in presenting the five points.  I am not at all concerned here with the exaggeration of their meaning by hyper-calvinists.  Second, what is done here will be a somewhat cursory glance at each of the points.  I want to encourage you to dig deeper by reading works by R. C. Sproul, John MacArthur, John Piper, Albert Mohler, Mark Dever, Ligon Duncan, Philip Graham Ryken, Jerry Bridgess to name of a few of the authors that can help us all understand better these five points.  Let me recommend that you get a recent book by Richard Philips that is just over one hundred pages, What is so Great about the Doctrines of Grace, as a very helpful assesment of these five points.   Third, let’s avoid what will be the temptation to separate these five points from each other.  They belong together and must be heard and studied together.  Some of this may be new and different for some of us because it sounds so “un-baptistic.”  I told my Sunday School Class this morning that I am often amazed at how many Baptists really think that Baptist Theology and Biblical Theology are the same.  They are not.  In fact, if you trace our history you will find that most of our founders were full-fledged five point Calvinsits and how we changed from that is a whole different series of blogs.

So, let’s begin with TOTAL DEPRAVITY.  John Macarthur prefers the term, “radical depravity,” which I like as well.  Too many are taking total depravity to mean what it does not mean.  It does not mean than any one of us is as bad as we could be.  Isn’t that encouraging?  Although we are born into sin and are totally sinful, we are not as depraved as we could be.  Total depravity simply means that nothing in us is unaffected by sin.  If you want to look at us as “tripartite” beings made up of body, soul, and spirit then total depravity means that sin has broken our spirit that there is separation from God from birth, sin has broken our soul so that there is no desire for God but rather its opposite which is desiring to gratify our selves and sin has broken our bodies so that as we age, we do not get stronger but weaker.  Total depravity simply states that sin has poisoned us to the point that when we are born we are not well; we are not even sick, we are dead!

Now whenever this issue is addressed someone wants to raise and rightly so the question of the imago Dei or the image of God.  If we are born into sin and every dimension of who we are is poisoned by sin, then what about our being made in the image of God?  Some want to suggest that since what separates us from the animal world is our ability to think and reason logically that this component of our being is not corrupted by sin.  But even if we go with this understanding of what the image of God in us is, it is still true that sin at best has marred this image in man and some would go beyond that.  Some would say that the image of God in humans is not effaced but it is erased.  Either way, it is seriously stamped by sin.  Listen to David in Psalm 51 [+/-] or read Paul’s perspective on our plight in Romans 3 [+/-].

James Boice says that when we look at the basic nature of humans we have three choices:  we are either basically good and need knowledge to know how to be better, we are partially sinful and need education to help us grow from darkness toward the light or we are evil and need the tranforming work of the grace of God.  And then he says that if the last is true, we must decide whether we are sick or whether we are dead.  If we are sick, then we need medicine; if we are dead, then we need resurrection.  Now right here is where the doctrines of grace have their beginning and their impetus.  Everyone of us must answer biblically the question, “are we sinners by nature and if we are sinners by nature, what is the extent of our sinfulness?”  John Calvin along with so many others argued that the Bible teaches that we are thorougly sinful from birth and that apart from a work of grace in our lives that is the result of the work of God in our lives, we would never be saved.  If I am bascially ok by nature then I can figure out what I need to make my life better, but if I am sinful to the core then someone or something has to come from outside me to change the very core of my life.  How we see our sinfulness shapes how we see everything else.

One other thing:  seeing our sinfulness must happen not in the context of other sinners but in the ineffable light of God’s holiness.  It is that light that must be pondered when we are contemplating how sinful we really are.

Print this Post Print this Post

One Response to “A More In-Depth look at TULIP”

  1. on 15 Jul 2008 at 9:17 pm 1.Lorretta said …

    Wow…

    It’s only recently that I’ve started thinking about these things and recognizing the beautiful, awful truth. Up until 3 months ago, I had spent my time believing that I chose Jesus. What a wonderful revelation to discover that actually, Jesus chose me!

    It doesn’t take much for me to recognize total depravity…I see it in the mirror everyday. I, like Paul, am confounded the problem of the struggle to do good while constantly falling on my face through the bad I do even while I’m trying not to.

    Yeah, I don’t need medicine…I need resurrection. No doubt.

Trackback This Post | Subscribe to the comments through RSS Feed

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.